Primary School (Key Stage 2) Achievement and Attainment Tables 2006

 
 

Search






Browse

  1. North East
  2. North West
  3. Yorkshire and The Humber
  4. East Midlands
  5. West Midlands
  6. East of England
  7. London
  8. South East
  9. South West

  1. North East
  2. North West
  3. Yorkshire and The Humber
  4. East Midlands
  5. West Midlands
  6. East of England
  7. London
  8. South East
  9. South West

User guide

The Tables show how the KS2 results of pupils in each maintained school have changed over the past four years. Bar charts show the aggregates of the three percentages of pupils achieving Level 4 or above and Level 5 in the English, mathematics and science tests in each of the years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006.

The Level 4 and above aggregate is calculated as follows:

No of pupils achieving L4+ in English    +    No of pupils achieving L4+ in maths    +    No of pupils achieving L4+ in science   x 100      =    Aggregate (to the nearest whole number)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
No of eligible pupils in English No of eligible pupils in maths No of eligible pupils in science

The Level 5 aggregate is calculated as follows:

No of pupils achieving L5 in English    +    No of pupils achieving L5 in maths    +    No of pupils achieving L5 in science   x 100      =    Aggregate (to the nearest whole number)
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
No of eligible pupils in English No of eligible pupils in maths No of eligible pupils in science

What the year on year comparisons tell you

From the bar charts, you can see the history of a school's KS2 results, and whether they have stayed at the same level over time. Because each year group is made up of different pupils, with different prior attainment and other characteristics, results may fluctuate from year to year for reasons to do with the pupils rather than the school. Small fluctuations from year to year are unlikely to be significant, particularly if the school's year group is small.